Jesus Politics: Why Christians Should Vote For Mitt Romney – By Kent Landhuis

Zack —  October 23, 2012 — 18 Comments

 

 

The second guest post in the Jesus Politics synchroblog comes to us from Kent Landhuis. Kent describes himself this way, “Husband to one beautiful Republican, Father of three Democrats, pastor for 26 years, blogger for one.  Follower of Jesus. Lover of ideas.” Make sure you check out Kent’s blog, Rescuing Jesus.

 

I am a political lobbyist virgin.  My interest in politics – particularly the race for president – is high, but as a pastor I’ve always guarded my opinions about specific candidates carefully.  My call is to preach the Gospel, so I’ve always left politicking to others. Until now. Intrigued by Zack’s generous offer to make a political case (and earn a guest post on The American Jesus!) I think I’ve found my opinion and I’m ready to spew my presidential choice to the world. Here goes.

I am voting for Mitt Romney and I think every Christian should do the same.

Recently, Kevin DeYoung at the Gospel Coalition  offered up some great lines we are not likely to hear at the presidential debates. One of those lines was “There’s a simple explanation for the inconsistency: I changed my mind. I think a good leader changes his mind sometimes. Let me tell you why I’ve changed my mine.”

Initially I bought in to the perception that Romney was a flip-flopper and I was not a fan. After a more thorough look, I believe any changes Romney has made are the mark of a great leader. Romney’s positions have evolved over time which serves as a tribute to his intellect and his character. As this evolution unfolds, I see a leader willing to carefully study issues and then examine his position in light of new information. Finally, the decision is made – not based on some preconceived conclusion – based on what is right. This is the kind of leadership I expect from our president.

For me, character is far more important than any specific issue or position. It is impossible to predict the avalanche of diverse issues facing America in the next four years. It is not impossible to predict the character of the individuals who will be leading. In hiring individuals to any position I use the  axiom – what they’ve done in the past they will do in the future. Looking at past behavior it is no contest which of the candidates has the better track record in the character department.

Cultural observer and scholar Os Guinness recently wrote a marvelous little book entitled Free Peoples Suicide: Sustainable  Freedom and the American Future. In this book Guinness makes an insightful case that without people of character our hard-fought freedom cannot be sustained. Good character is essential for democracy and freedom to succeed. And if freedom cannot be sustained, then America is at risk. If the fundamental nature of who we are as free republic is altered the consequences is bad for all people in the world.

Guinness warns, “In the end the ultimate threat to the American republic will be Americans. The problem is not wolves at the door but termites in the floor.” These are not the words of right-wing conspiracy whack job but a widely respected, deeply concerned and thought-full evangelical leader. I believe the Romney/Ryan ticket offers the best hope for sustaining liberty in America. As an evangelical Christian, Romney’s Mormon faith and Ryan’s Catholicism do not concern me relative to the Oval Office. The government is not the church. We don’t want, nor do we expect, the White House to proselytize but to govern. Good governance – especially in a democracy – requires character. Perhaps of all the religions of the world, both Mormonism and Catholicism provide a sold foundation  of moral values essential to good governance.

Both Romney and Ryan demonstrate repeatedly the stellar character necessary to succeed in environments desperately needing moral makeovers. They have navigated both the private sector and the public sector demonstrating high moral fiber. The values we want in those who govern are not unique to evangelical Christianity, but they are definitely not hostile to our Christian faith. For this reason I believe the Romney/Ryan ticket offers the best hope of sustaining a liberty that is essential to a fundamental prosperity for all people.

In my opinion, a vote is always cast as for one thing and against another. Truth be told, I have been deeply disappointed in the Obama presidency. Obama started as the great  hope for post-partisan politics. The promise of hope and change that would reform Washington and America. What we have experienced is the greatest divide in politics in my lifetime. This kind of divisive politics that sets one group against another will not sustain America but destroy her. I believe this is fundamentally a character issue. The outcome of Obama in the White House has been like termites eating away the soul of America because of the way his rhetoric, policies and behaviors have shaped us as a people. It is time for change.

As a Christian I believe engagement in the political process is part of my duty. Every Christina should vote. (An informed vote.) For those called to be politicians their duty is good governance. I have high expectations for all who hold public office. I believe Mitt Romney will meet and exceed my expectations for governing in a way that leads America to greatness once again. When men of good character lead, then good things happen. That is why I am voting for Mitt Romney. And I think you should too!

I guess I did have an opinion. It was good for me, how about you? What do you think?

 

If you agree with Kent, that Mitt Romney is the candidate Christians should be voting for, then write a post about it, send me the link, and I’ll feature it here. 

If you disagree, leave a comment and let me know what you think. REMEMBER: It’s ok to argue your point vigorously, but do so with civility so your comment doesn’t disappear from the thread.

 

Zack

Posts

  • http://www.fivedills.com Greg Dill

    Men with great character still make stupid mistakes. George W Bush had great character and I voted for him in 2000. But, I regret my vote because little did I know that he would help lead America into two wars that we still haven’t got out of. Being a pacifist, I am sorrowed that hundreds, if not thousands, of innocent people have been killed by collateral damage by the American war machine. This goes against every fiber of my faith in Christ. Good character is certainly an admirable trait, but good character doesn’t always warrant a good leader. And, in some cases, good character can be deceiving.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=27216786 Daniel Mistak

    I don’t understand how you can say that he has “great character.” His changes are less about taking a moral stance and more about being a venture capitalist pitching a sale. Even last night at the foreign policy debate, everything Romney said was a move to the center, or even left, of Obama because that sells better on the national stage than the hawkishness he peddled during the primaries. It isn’t character, it’s lying to get what you want.

    In the best light, Romney is a businessman who views politics as a business, and right now he’s just angling for the deal. Fix the bottom line and everything else gets fixed. This is not how a just economy works. A free market may increase wealth, but it does nothing to protect those who are at the bottom, are priced out of the market, and are forced to sell their labor to make enough money to buy more cheap stuff to eke out a dismal existence (this is a necessary condition for a free market, by the way).

    All of this talk of character is misplaced. Romans 5:3-5 says “we also boast in our sufferings knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, and hope does not disappoint us.” While Obama was spending time on the streets of NYC and Chicago trying to understand poverty in the United States, Mitt Romney was buying companies with debt, liquidating the companies, and moving the jobs overseas. While Obama was coming to understand what it means to be raised by his grandparents as a half-black kid–meeting his father for only a week while he as 10–Romney was living the life of one of the most privileged families in America. Which of those two had the requisite suffering needed to develop character?

    In the end, just because Mitt came over to your side does not mean that he agrees with you. He’s pivoted before, and he’ll pivot again. In the end it means none of us, maybe even Mitt himself, knows which Mitt Romney would be president if he had the chance. That’s not character.

    P.S., Obama hasn’t been able to reach across the aisle because the Repub. party has been maddening. Obamacare was a republican bill basically. Repub. leaders said that their goal after Obama’s election was to make Obama a “one-term president.” That certainly doesn’t sound like its Obama’s fault, does it?

    • http://twitter.com/candacedatz Candace Datz

      I agree with you Daniel about the flip-flopping Romney, but I don’t see it necessarily as lying (which it pretty much is) but as something that is inherent to our broken party system, which requires candidates to pander to their extreme left or right (depending on their party) in order to win the primary and then quickly shift back to center to seal up the moderate vote. It’s horribly inconsistent, but we saw it with Obama and McCain in ’08 too. It’s a symptom of a broken system and can only be remedied with serious reform.

  • Joshua Shope

    I have to agree with Daniel’s comment below. To me, Romney’s sudden shift to the center is not a mark of character, but rather a shameless ploy to misrepresent himself on the national stage. To me, it smacks of a lack of character that he is telling outright lies about his past policies.

    I also find his lack of concern for the poor a sign of a lack of character. A Romney presidency would be awful for the middle and lower class in this country, groups that a person of character would defend.

    • Ryan Couch

      To quote Kip from Napoleon Dynamite -”like anyone could really know that.”

      How does the author really know Romney’s character?

  • http://www.braintarts.wordpress.com/ MichaelL65

    Sir, this was a great piece of satire! It was satire, wasn’t it? I mean, you really can’t believe that the mark of good leadership is someone that changes his opinion every five minutes?

  • ZackHunt

    Kent,

    You talked a lot about Obama lacking character, but I didn’t catch any specific examples (maybe I missed them?). Would you mind elaborating on that?

  • http://twitter.com/candacedatz Candace Datz

    Kent – while I appreciate your thoughts on Romney/Ryan’s faiths and how it’s the character of a leader that counts, not one’s religious affiliation (which I think a lot of Christians could stand to learn), I don’t think that character is the only thing for which we should elect an official. I believe that ideas are extremely important. What are the specific ideas/policies of the Romney ticket that are important to you?

    • concerned for America

      What are ideas without character? Character dictates how you will deal with ideas you have and how you will approach everything that comes across your plate. Character is what counts in an election. That said I am not sold on Romney’s character.

  • Chad B

    Greg,
    As a pacifist, are you ok with Obama’s stance on abortion? Does helpless babies being killed in the womb bother you less than “soldiers dying needlessly”? I do not agree with either candidate’s entire platform, but for me personally, as a Christian, I have to decide what issues are most important. Abortion, our relationship with Israel, and not becoming a socialist society are three of the big ones for me. These, among a few other “smaller issues” (relatively speaking) are why Romney is an easy choice for me.

    • Joshua Shope

      Chad, I’d be curious to know why our relationship with Israel and our status as a non-socialist nation are important issues to you as a Christian.

      • ZackHunt

        Interesting question. I like it.

    • http://twitter.com/candacedatz Candace Datz

      Chad – Greg didn’t say he was voting for Obama. There are other options in this election. For an example you can read my post on this blog from yesterday.

    • http://www.fivedills.com Greg Dill

      Chad – Abortion is one portion of the bigger equation. You can’t campaign on a pro-life platform and then promote war, capital punishment, and support the free distribution of guns on the streets of America. It’s an oxymoron. Yes, abortion is a travesty and I myself am pro-life. But, it’s hypocritical of Republicans (and many Christians too) to claim they are pro-life, but turn their heads to the MILLIONS of people who are killed during war, capital punishment, and from guns on the streets of America.

  • Kent

    Wow – thanks for the feedback. Where did the idea that Romney is a liar come from? Look no farther than the Obama campaign machine and Obama himself. To be a liar requires a lie? What lie? To perpetuate this kind of myth – or even allow your campiang to continue spreading it is one example of poor character.
    Two examples of great ideas on the Romney/Ryan ticket – Shrink the government and shrink the deficit.
    Hope that helps clarify.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=27216786 Daniel Mistak

      I have no idea what this means.

  • Robert Williams

    I noticed a huge lack of scripture in this article. When saying that Christians “should” vote a certain way, wouldn’t it make sense to speak from the Bible and not from interpretation or opinion?

  • Pingback: Jesus Politics: The Wrap Up