Was Albert Mohler’s ‘Evangelical Disaster’ Actually A Good Thing?

 

In a recent interview Southern Baptist Theological Seminary president and the media’s apparent go-to evangelical for all quotes concerning evangelicalism, Albert Mohler described Mitt Romney’s loss in the presendential election as a “evangelical disaster.”

He’s right. It was. At least for his particular brand of evangelicalism.

But I think that disaster might actually be a good thing for evangelicalism as a whole.

For starters, it liberates, or hopefully will liberate, evangelicalism from the cold, dead heads of people like Mohler and other prominent politician preachers who all (or at least mostly all) seem to have the same thing in common. They’re white, middle class, often times Reformed in their theology, and, of course, they only vote Republican. After all, Jesus may not have had a political party, but “clearly” he wouldn’t have voted Democrat, right?

What’s actually great about Mohler’s evangelical disaster is that it has forced his evangelical constituency (at least for the moment) to face the reality that not only are there evangelicals out there who are not white, not middle-class, and not Reformed in their theology, but there are even evangelicals out there who vote Democrat.

While that may sound inconceivable and perhaps even borderline blasphemous for some, it speaks to the reality that the monolith that has been political evangelicalism is beginning to crumble….and that’s a good thing.

It’s a good thing because it injects much needed diversity into the conversation and that diversity, hopefully, will force the evangelical church to do some serious reflection on issues and stances she has heretofore considered gospel which may, in fact, not be as in line with the gospel of Jesus as she may have thought.

Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, it is my hope, although it is probably just wishful thinking, that the evangelical disaster will force the evangelical church to reassess her approach to establishing the kingdom of God on earth via the United States of America, specifically a Republican United States of America (though Democrat would be just as problematic).

While many of us pay lip service to the fact that the kingdom of God will not be established through the ballot box, the drastic imbalance between our political passions and our zeal (or lack thereof) for radically loving and serving our neighbor speaks to a different reality.

In other words, we may proclaim that the kingdom of God will only come about through Jesus, but we seem to think he could use a little help through the ballot box.

However, Mohler’s evangelical disaster speaks to a changing reality in our country wherein evangelicalism via the political right no longer has the political might to push through whatever legislation or policies it deems fit. That there are evangelicals now “voting for the enemy” (an absolutely abhorrent mindset), means that there is no longer a unified, evangelical political agenda.

But that too is a good thing.

It’s a good thing because it means that evangelicals will, hopefully, be forced to pursue the changes they want to see in the world outside of the political arena. That is to say, rather than being able to simply force our theology onto the rest of the world, evangelicalism must now turn to incarnating that theology to the world and then let the world decide if that is something actually worth following.

In many ways that is terrifying. Voting for your theology is a lot easier than living it out. It’s a lot easier, and a lot more comfortable, to go the polling station than it is to go to the ends of the earth to make disciples.

Which means, Mohler is exactly right. We have witnessed an evangelical disaster in that the best laid plans of establishing the kingdom of God in the easiest and most comfortable way possible have been laid waste.

But even that is a good thing, because Christianity finds its greatest hope in disaster.

It was the disaster of the cross that not only redeemed creation, but forced the people of God to rethink and reevaluate what it means to be the people of God in and for the world.

Though this present disaster is by no means even close to being on par with the disaster of the cross, hopefully it will once again for the people of God rethink and reevaluate what it means to be the people of Gdd in and for the world.

If that happens, then this election will not just have been an evangelical disaster.

It could, in fact, turn out to be the best thing that’s happened to American evangelicalism in a long, long time.

 

Grace and peace,

Zack Hunt

 

  • http://lilablackbird.tumblr.com/ Charlotte

    That is to say, rather than being able to simply force our theology onto the rest of the world, evangelicalism must now turn to incarnating that theology to the world and then let the world decide if that is something actually worth following.

    I have been thinking this for so long, thank you for articulating it. I live in the Bible Belt so a lot of my friends are conservative, and I couldn’t even go on Facebook on election night, there was so much hate and despair. I wanted to yell at my computer “The kingdom of God is not going to come about through political means! Calm down!”, but yelling at inanimate objects doesn’t really help anything, lol.

  • Pingback: Linkathon 11/14 » Phoenix Preacher | Phoenix Preacher

  • http://www.braintarts.wordpress.com/ MichaelL65

    When will evangelicals realize that they are just one narrow spectrum of Christianity?

    • Pseudonym

      The point of this piece, I thought, is that evangelicals are not such a narrow spectrum of Christianity after all. It’s just that the politicized religious right doesn’t understand this yet.

  • Pingback: John Hagee: God Is Angry About Obama’s Re-Election

  • Pingback: Wednesday Link List « Thinking Out Loud

  • http://www.facebook.com/michael.t.long Michael T. Long

    Zack, I am continually moved by your ability to put my thoughts into words, even though we’ve never met.