My God Is Smaller Than Yours

Zack —  February 1, 2013 — 9 Comments

jesus-wash-feet

Greater than Superman.

That’s how many of us think about God.

If you were to listen to many of the conversations going on in evangelical circles today, you would hear many of the same things about God’s sovereignty repeated over and over again..

God has to be the biggest, strongest, greatest, most awesome being in the universe otherwise God can’t be the God of the Christian faith.

In some sense, God does have to be “greater” than the rest of us or God would be no different than the rest of us.

However, Jesus throws a cog in the wheelhouse of “my God is bigger than your god”

In Jesus we see the infinite enfleshed in the finite, the transcendent incarnated in the immanent.

The God who should be greater than Superman became a mere human in a backwater town, in a conquered country, on a small planet, in a remote corner of the universe.

Worse yet for those of us who need our God to be the biggest, baddest, most ultimate sovereign being in the universe, this God who by all rights should have come as king, instead became a humble carpenter. This God who by all rights should have been surround only by the greatest, most holy people in the world, instead surrounded himself with fishermen, tax collectors, prostitutes, and sinners of all sorts.

Then, in the ultimate insult to our greater than Superman theology, this God who by all rights should have had the world bowing at his feet, instead chose to let that world conquer, humiliate, and ultimately murder him.

Despite this portrait of God we are presented with in the gospels, there are many among us who simply want nothing to do with sort of Jesus.

Or at least that’s the message they present.

The Jesus that has come to dominate so many corners of evangelicals is a Jesus who, by necessity of a particular theology, must be a manly man who takes nothing from no one, leaps over buildings in a single bound, destroys his enemies with a look, and occasionally jumps into the octagon to show off his MMA skills.

Some of this Jesus is greater than Superman rhetoric comes from our American ideology which insist that we and everything we have and believe in must be the biggest and the best. Some of it also stems from the aforementioned particular form of theology that, contrary to a New Testament narrative that describes a Jesus who made himself nothing and became a servant to all, instead insists that Jesus must be a manly destroyer of his enemies in order to sustain a patriarchal, manipulative, and wrathful theological framework.

Ultimately, though, this Jesus (or God) is greater than Superman theology is an echo of the Garden of Eden.

As we all know, Adam and Even were kicked out of the Garden for eating from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Most of us assume they were kicked out for simply breaking the rules, or for stealing.

But there was a deeper, much more serious issue at hand.

The sin of Adam and Eve wasn’t simple rule breaking. Their sin was about power, control, and, ultimately, idolatry. In taking the fruit from the tree they were, in the words of the serpent, attempting to become like God. They simply couldn’t handle a world in which they weren’t in control.

The thing about theology, and particularly theology that’s all about a God who’s bigger, badder, and in control of everything, is that it gives us a sense of control over the world because it convinces us, or deludes us, into thinking we have everything figured out and, thus, everything under control.

A God who isn’t bigger, badder, and in control of everything simply won’t do because it doesn’t satisfy our most ancient desire to be in control.

But if Jesus is our guide, then control is exactly what we’re called to give up, along with our desire to be greater than everyone else.

As Christians the good news of our message is not, “My God is bigger, badder, and more awesome than you can imagine.” As Christians, our gospel proclaims “My God is smaller than yours. In fact, our God is so small that, even though he is God, he

did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;
rather, he made himself nothing
by taking the very nature of a slave,
being made in human likeness.
And being found in appearance as a man,
he humbled himself
by becoming obedient to death—
even death on a cross!”

This isn’t a negation of God’s greatness. It’s an affirmation of it. God is great enough to became small enough to put on flesh, dwell among us, and redeem the world. In other words, for God, true greatness lies not in God’s ability to smite, conquer, and destroy, but in God’s humility, servitude, and self-sacrificing love for creation.

Which means portraying Jesus as a manly man, who takes nothing from no one, leaps over buildings in a single bound, destroys his enemies with a look, and occasionally jumps into the octagon to show off his MMA skills isn’t just cheesy, misogynistic, terrible theology.

It’s a false gospel.

 

Grace and peace,

Zack Hunt

Zack

Posts

  • Jon

    Like it!!

  • iamstillrobdavis

    Hey Zack, super intriguing post.

    Have you had much exposure to the “weak theology” of Jack Caputo?

    This post also reminded me of this: http://experimentaltheology.blogspot.com/2012/08/your-god-is-too-big.html

    Would love to hear your thoughts on how your understanding of God compares with these others…

  • http://lilablackbird.tumblr.com/ Charlotte

    “God is great enough to became small enough to put on flesh, dwell among us, and redeem the world.” I love this thought! Great post.

  • Tony

    “In Jesus we see the infinite enfleshed in the finite, the transcendent incarnated in the immanent.” Fantastic line. An all-powerful God who CHOSE to become man, to step away from His “Godness.” All for our sake. Crazy.

    This part sums it up perfectly – “God is great enough to became small enough to put on flesh, dwell among us, and redeem the world. In other words, for God, true greatness lies not in God’s ability to smite, conquer, and destroy, but in God’s humility, servitude, and self-sacrificing love for creation.” Thanks for the post.

  • Garrett

    George Carlin summarized religious motivated war with “My god has a bigger D!## than your god!”

  • http://twitter.com/faithguard Randy

    It would be a false dichotomy to present God as having to be either big and bad, or small and humble. Jesus is both. He’s the Lamb of God, AND He’s the Lion of the tribe of Judah. He came in humility, but will return in power and great glory (see Revelation 19).

    • Karen

      That begs the question, however, of what is the nature and source of God’s sort of “power” and “glory”? These references in the Scripture to Christ’s return in His glory and power often use words and images of worldly political and military might (albeit with some twists–what warrior has a sword coming out of his mouth?). Why is this so? Is it because Christ will literally come back in a show of worldly military power and force? Will He force His human enemies to their knees at the point of a literal physical weapon to “confess” He is Lord against their wills? Some Christians seem to think so. Or do the Scriptures employ this imagery for some other reason? I believe especially for modern conservative Christians many of whom have been trained to read even the Scripture’s more apocalyptic (by the nature of this genre, highly symbolic) images in a very literalistic manner, what is imagined by God’s sort of “power” and “glory” is very different than the real spiritual meaning of the Apostle’s vision. I don’t know that this is what you are doing, but I hear many Christians who write or say things like you have just done who go on to describe a return of Christ in terms that very much looks like Jesus as a sort of Mel Gibson “Braveheart” without the defeat, torture and martyrdom!

      I believe Christ’s authority and glory are intrinsic to His Being and in His Second Advent come from the very same place as they did when His glory was only partly manifest just to a very few in the Incarnation. Even in His “humble” state, do you notice Christ’s “humility” didn’t preclude Him boldly dressing down the hypocritical Scribes and Pharisees nor mean He was standing idly by while “His Father’s House” was turned into a place for fleecing the flock? it seems to me God’s power and authority reside in the very nature of Who He is in His holy love, and God’s sort of love is humble by definition, as we see in the Person of Christ, just as, by definition, it is truth/light, and it is life from death. Please don’t misunderstand me–I believe that this holy love cannot fail to triumph over sin, death and evil, but think it is an error to suppose it will do so in the ways of human politics and military might even though the Scriptures’ apocalyptic books employ aspects of this in their imagery. I see this as a condescension to the limits of human language, and I suspect these images reflect the point in history when Christ’s true nature in its fullness–the glory intrinsic to the utter truth of His Being will simply have been made fully manifest to everyone. How exactly that occurs I wouldn’t pretend to fully understand. The Apostle John states in 1 John 4:8 that God IS “love” and in 1 John 1:5 that God IS “light”–never are we told in Scripture that God IS power in this same sort of grammatical construction. That seems important to me.

  • Pingback: Best of the Rest (Feb 18)

  • Pingback: Best of the Rest (Feb 18) | Menno Nerds